March 2009
M	T	W	T	F	S	S
		Apr »
	1
2	3	4	5	6	7	8
9	10	11	12	13	14	15
16	17	18	19	20	21	22
23	24	25	26	27	28	29
30	31

Pharmacy Links

HOMOSEXUAL OFFENDERS VS. ADULTS: HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVITY

March 27, 2009

In all measurements the homosexual offenders vs. adults appear as the most homosexually oriented of all groups. Ninety-eight per cent had, after puberty, sexual contact with other males. Furthermore, by any age, more of them had had homosexual experience than any other group: 69 per cent by age fourteen; 78 per cent by sixteen; 87 per cent by eighteen; 88 per cent by twenty; and 93 per cent by age twenty-six. By the time they attained their majority this group had accumulated more homosexually experienced members than any other group accumulated in a lifetime. They also had their initial postpubertal homosexual experience at the youngest age; the average (median) individual began when he was 14.1 years old. This “early start” is partly because the average homosexual offender vs. adults reached puberty earlier than the average member of any other group, but it is more obviously the result of pre-existing homosexual interest and activity that carried over from prepubertal life.

Whereas in most groups the proportion of individuals with more than incidental homosexual experience is substantially less than the proportion of those with any degree of homosexual experience, the homosexual offenders vs. adults are unique in having the proportions more nearly equal (98 vs. 93 per cent). The group contains very few men whose experience was a matter only of brief schoolboy experimentation, rare lapses during intoxication, attempts born of curiosity or a desire for novelty—all of which are common among nonhomosexual-offender groups.

In age-specific incidence the homosexual offenders vs. adults naturally lead all other groups. Among the single males following age-period puberty-15, when 69 per cent were involved, between 84 and 93 per cent of them had sexual activity with other males in every age-period up to age forty-five. To dramatize these figures one can point out that these proportions, in any one five-year period, exceed the proportions that individuals of groups other than homosexual offenders accumulated throughout their fives. Even among those married between 41 and 60 per cent had homosexual activity in all age-periods up to forty. These figures are always far in excess of those of the second ranking group (usually a homosexual group). Similarly, the proportions for the separated, divorced, or widowed are always the largest, generally ranging from three fifths to four fifths.

The distinctiveness of the homosexual offenders vs. adults is again emphasized by the frequency of homosexual activity. After puberty they averaged 85 experiences a year outside institutions—a frequency almost double that of the homosexual offenders vs. minors, and 25 times that of the control group. In frequency of homosexual activity to orgasm during various age-periods, the unmarried homosexual offender vs. adults is second to none. His average (mean) frequencies range from 1.27 per week between puberty and age fifteen to 2.29 between twenty-one and twenty-five. The median individual displays frequencies of from 0.56 to 1.15 over the same span of time.

The married homosexual offenders vs. adults who continued homosexual activity had frequencies far beyond those of any other group. The average (median) individual had sexual contact with other males between twice a month and 7 times a month. The mean frequencies are more stable: 1.15 to 1.59 during age-periods 16-20 and 36-40 inclusive. While the number of cases in any of these age-periods is very small (ranging from six to 12) the differences are sufficiently large to indicate that marriage is no “cure” for homosexuality.

The proportion of total outlet derived from homosexual behavior is much greater among the homosexual offenders vs. adults than among any other groups. The unmarried drew from 16 to 59 per cent of their outlet from this source in various age-periods, and the married 8 to 19 per cent. These latter two figures seem small until one realizes no other group, not even the other homosexual offenders, ever attained even the 8 per cent level, and none of the heterosexual offenders exceeded a 1 per cent figure.

Our attempt to calculate the average (median) number of male sexual partners was frustrated by the extraordinary promiscuity of the homosexual offenders vs. adults. Many of them judged their partners as numbering in the hundreds and some in the thousands, and we could obtain only rough estimates rather than precise figures from them. All that we can say is that 63 per cent had over 75 male partners. To the reader unacquainted with homosexual life such large numbers may be incredible, and a word of explanation is necessary. First, one must realize that the homosexual is often as interested in sexual activity for its own sake as he is interested in achieving his own orgasm—in fact, he is sometimes more interested in the former. This is particularly true of the homosexual who is desirous of fellating other males. Consequently, if he has the opportunity to have sexual contact with a number of males in a short period of time, he will do so, either delaying his own orgasm until he has had contact with every available male or continuing his sexual activity after having his own orgasm. Thus in one evening under ideal circumstances, as in a Turkish bath catering to those interested in homosexuality, he may tally more sexual partners than many purely heterosexual males may accumulate in a lifetime. This is not to say that the homosexual is radically different from the heterosexual male in his desires, attitudes, and general sexual philosophy—the heterosexual would count as many partners if females were as eager and accessible as males. The heterosexual’s fantasy of an evening in a harem is precisely analogous to the homosexual’s actual evening in the steam room.

A study of the age of the youngest partner in homosexual activity since the subject (the homosexual offender vs. adults) was age eighteen reveals that these men are not interested in prepubescents. Nine per cent reported contact with a male under twelve years of age, while 33 per cent had had contact with males twelve to fifteen; 29 per cent with males sixteen to seventeen (the largest percentage); 23 per cent with males eighteen to twenty-four; and only 5 per cent with males twenty-five and older. This is not necessarily indicative of age preference; the distribution seems more probably due to the fact that the great majority of individuals were homosexually active at and after age eighteen. An active eighteen-year-old would probably have partners ranging, say, from four years his junior to four years his senior, thus accounting for the large percentages whose youngest partner (since they themselves were eighteen) was in the 12-15 and 16-17 age-categories. The tiny percentage whose youngest partner was twenty-five or over is the simple consequence of the fact that virtually all the homosexual offenders vs. adults had homosexual experience before that age.

As to the preferred age, we not unexpectedly find that of the .three homosexual-offender groups the offenders vs. adults incline most strongly to older partners of from twenty-five to thirty-four, an age-range that includes the average (median) age of the homosexual offenders vs. adults themselves. A substantial number (40 per cent) preferred males eighteen to twenty-four. Fewer men than in either of the other two homosexual groups expressed interest in anyone below eighteen: 15 per cent said sixteen to seventeen, 8 per cent said twelve to fifteen, and 1 per cent said they would prefer boys under twelve. This pattern essentially duplicates the age preferences expressed for females; the disparity in age preference according to gender that was so pronounced among the homosexual offenders vs. minors does not exist here.

In their attitude toward male homosexuality in general, the homosexual offenders vs. adults showed the greatest approval of any group. In many cases (40 per cent) their approval seemed so self-evident that we unfortunately did not question them on the matter. Even so, their position is clear: of all groups, fewest of the homosexual offenders vs. adults expressed disapproval or neutrality; the largest number expressed definite approval. We are sure that if we had asked the opinion of that 40 per cent whom we did not question on this point, the proportion who approved would have been even greater.

*209\161\2*